glock thought they had a winner on their hands with the gap.
its sole purpose was to give near 45acp performance and high capacity in a handgun format the size of a 9mm. Purty close ballistics i gather with lighter bullets, but lagin' a bit in the 230 gr dept.
The round suffers from available choices in ammo, and suffers in price accordingly. While the idea may had been sound, few other firearm makers jumped on the band wagon. Springfield xd did, but later also came out with the 45 acp with a comfortable grip(at least in my hands)---same goes for the glock 21SF which is a 45acp that does not feel near as blocky as the standard 21. Results are the standard acp guns out-sellin' the gap guns in like models. I will be suprised if anyone else gets into the gap market---and also wonder if springfield will stay in the gap market--other than to be a thorn in glock's side..............
I also find few gunshops that carry the gap guns or the gap ammo, and when they do, the selections in both are lackin'.
From just the ammo standpoint, the acp is the better way to go where there are tons of options both domestic and import in choices, and with these choices, the acp is competitive within itself so therefore we can find especially fmj ammo at cheaper prices than the gap offerings.............
i'd take one as a gift, but would not out-right buy one.............