Gunner Forum banner

Homedefense .45ACP Loads?

2924 Views 25 Replies 8 Participants Last post by  Bountyhunter
I want some warm homedefense loads. I,m starting priming tomorrow. the first 100rds. I'm loading some 230gr. XTP bullets. I'm thinking some where in the ballpark of 6.3gr. of Unique should put me pushing 900fps out of a 5"bbl.

Does that sound about right to you fellers?
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
I loaded all my FMJ 230 grain loads with about 6 grains of Unique. +/- .1 grains. They all shot great. I was told that 6 grains would send the slug down range at about 850 fps so 6.3 should be just about 900 fps, maybe a hair more.
Let me know how they work.....I want to load some .45's for SD also.....
i am----right or wrong---one of those that does not believe in usin' hand loads for defensive purposes due to a perceived chance of liability. It's just the way i've been trained and taught for a lot of years never to use reloads on duty.........

That bein' said and out of the way, if i was inclined to use handloads, i'd load up say 14 rds of one recipe and try them out at the range for accuracy. If the accuracy is there, then i'd load a 100 more for function testin' before i'd trust it.............................
Wizard said:
Let me know how they work.....I want to load some .45's for SD also.....
Are you saying he should load a few, shoot someone and then do a write up? :lol: :lol:
...vacuum cleaner salesmen are an acceptable medium for testing....
Or them damn witnesses. :evil:
deputy125 said:
i am----right or wrong---one of those that does not believe in usin' hand loads for defensive purposes due to a perceived chance of liability. It's just the way i've been trained and taught for a lot of years never to use reloads on duty.........

That bein' said and out of the way, if i was inclined to use handloads, i'd load up say 14 rds of one recipe and try them out at the range for accuracy. If the accuracy is there, then i'd load a 100 more for function testin' before i'd trust it.............................
So whats up with liability on reloads? Are they considered more deadly? How can my reloads be more deadly than Hydroshocks or some other factory ammo? If I shoot you with either one your still going to be just as dead!

I just can't bring my self to load light(medium about as low as I go). That's the reason I'm not a big fan of handgun competition. They load so light, they might as well be shooting .22s. Besides the fact that a 1911 in any caliber other than .45acp is also cheating IMHO.

I checked my Little Dandy rotor chart & a #12 rotor is listed at 6.0gr. of Unique so I'll probably put it in & see what it's throwing & go with it.


P.S. I prefer to use real scumbags for testing ammo on, ya know lawyers, politicians, judges etc. :twisted:
This is my view on the subject.

There are two possible out-comes a person may face in the aftermath of a self-defense shooting.
The 1st will be the criminal investigation. As far as this goes---if it's justifiable---then it's justifiable.

The 2nd possibility is really the more complicated one and that is a posible civil suit for "wrongfull death or inflicting serious bodily harm. Here you are putting your livelyhood in the hands of a jury that does not know a thing about you. A jury that in all likelyhood are not gun lovers--more or less gun owners, and generally may be quite ignorant. And not all the jury need to agree---a percentage "at fault" could be levied against you and the "beyond a reasonable doubt" does not exist here in a civil jury trial----just a perponderance of evidence.

Believe me, jurys can be a fickled beast and depending on how good their lawyer is and how bad yours is, anything can happen. Castle Doctrines not withstanding, a self defense shooting may ocour away from home and that legal protection afforded by a castle doctrine may not apply.

And if one stops and thinks about it-----Castle Doctrines-----why have they become so popular in a bunch of States? To prevent these types of civil suits would be my guess.............

What has been ingrained in my head from training all these years is that reloaded ammo is a liability. A jury could view that a person reloads his own ammo as factory offerings are not fast enough, strong enough, or lethal enough. And that the person reloads custom taylored ammo to ensure a "kill" or to inflict the most harm as possible. This type of belief does exist in this Country as is evident in some States such as New Jeresy. In new jeresy, HP handgun ammo is out-lawed as it appears to be "too lethal" or inflicts too much harm.. Yes i know, to the vast majority of us, this seems to be out-ragious thinking----but it exists. It would not be a terriible stretch for this same line of thinking to be applied to reloaded ammo as an attempt by the person to custom taylor a more deadly lethal maiming round. It suddenly may become an issue that the person did not shoot to stop the threat, but instead shot to kill, punish, maim, paralize, disfigure, leave children as orfens, wheelchair bound, etc, etc----in other words you did not care so much to save your hide as what you really wanted to do was to kill or punish the other guy. Trying to educate a jury could get expensive..........

So as for me, i carry "class A" factory stuff from reputiable makers such as hornady, speer, or remington. I practice with reloads that shoot to the same point of aim as the factory stuff. $30 a year for factory ammo for my magazines/speed loaders is cheap insurance. I have worked for two departments and reloaded ammo has been forbidden at both of them for street carry due to this liability concern. Also with my current dept, violation of policy in regards to ammo carry could definately land me in hot water for a suit.

Another issue for some is the quality of ammo. Now i will say that there are a lot of expert quality minded reloaders out there that know more about reloading than i ever will. But it has been my experience at the ranges and during competitions that the failure rate (feeding or no bang) of reloaded ammo is higher than "class A" factory ammo from a reputiable maker. This has been my experience and also is what i have seen involving other shooters. The failure rate may not be high----but it is still there. So when it comes to saving my own tail, i'm gonna go with the good factory stuff-------as probably about 99.9 % of LEO agencies do for street carry(strictly guess).

This is just an opinion but its also training that has been pounded into my head for a lot of years. It may never come up-----but then again, we are always reading these squirrely law suits in the paper----the vast majority dis-missed....but every once in a while there is a goofy one that a person will unbelievably win and capture national headlines--at least once a week.....and good lawyers don't come cheap. $30 a year for factory ammo is cheap insurance and just might be one less thing to worry about on the streets and in the courtroom.

I shoot a lot of reloads-----but the factory stuff goes back in the gun for carry.............
See less See more
+1, Deputy125----I can't see the chance of getting 12 intelligent, informed, level-headed jurors...not in this world.....
I have heard this same info from multiple sources but haven't heard of anyone that has been criminally proscuted for defending themselves with handloads or charged because they shot someone with them. That said Deputy's point about civil suits is valid as the perps who broke into your house was only looking for his lost cat and was studying rocket science on his own. You trapped him and blasted him with you specially hand loaded cannon so bad his mother didn't even recoginize him. :twisted:
Thanks guys! Yea after I thought about it I realized I was thinking about our wonderful judicial system (when I'm elected King I'm put'n a bounty on lawyers, all of them :twisted: ).


P.S. I checked my first three mags will be factory Hydro-Shocks. After that "All Bets Are Off!!!" :twisted:
...A cop shot a perp here with a .45 Hydrashok at cross-room range dead center the chest through a light shirt...the perp walked out and sat in the squad car to wait for the ambulance....nothing is fool-proof....bullet placement
bullet placement
bullet placement....think head shots....
sheepdog said:
...A cop shot a perp here with a .45 Hydrashok at cross-room range dead center the chest through a light shirt...the perp walked out and sat in the squad car to wait for the ambulance....nothing is fool-proof....bullet placement
bullet placement
bullet placement....think head shots....

Yep, I like the way you think :twisted:
i sure do miss the 200 gr flyin' ashtray loads...............

+1 on shot placement.....

train, train, train-----practice a lot of close order drills and double-tap.......keep firing until the threat is neutralized...............
I had the good fortune to live near Jim Clark...he loved the po-lice, and made my new Satin Nickel Combat Commander an ambi safety before they were commercially available...and deep throated my barrel...the Speer "Flying Ashtray" was my round of choice....they were like looking down a bull's throat!!! Seems like yesterday....or was it the day before????
Until the threat is neutralized. Does that mean until they stop wiggling? :eek:
When you hear the death rattle, they're usually neutralized....
Thats when the real danger begins from all the bloodsuckers.
...sadly true....
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top